“Hypostasis”, image of Jesus Christ by Gladys Torres de Pirela, Author Gladys Torres de Pirelaa (CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported)
Though they may not agree in all respects, proponents of postmodernism generally align themselves with feminism, multiculturalism, and postcolonialism [1][2]. While none of these concepts is by itself evil, they have become idols Progressives worship.
Progressive Christianity markets itself as accepting of all, in the supposed name of Christ [3][4]. Diversity and inclusivity are touted, as are political issues like voter rights [5][6]. The United Methodist Church illustrates this, prompting a schism with its approval of same sex marriage and the ordination of openly gay clergy. Of course, not even Progressive congregations necessarily remain united [7].
It must not be overlooked that many people who have turned to Progressive Christianity or left the church entirely (including many who consider themselves homosexual or transgender) have done so because of the hypocrisy, lack of compassion, or genuine abuse they have experienced within the church.
Their pain has not been adequately addressed; their doubts have not been adequately answered. The blame for this falls on the church. Self-righteousness and legalism are as sinful on our part is they were on the part of the Pharisees. Read more…
5th Century Christian sarcophagus depicting Christ and the Apostles, Museum of Fine Arts, Lyon, France, Author Vassil (PD)
Progressive Christians take the position that early Christianity was widely diverse theologically, so much so that it is impossible to know what Christ actually taught or His closest followers first believed. This is simply false, and can readily be refuted by the early creeds incorporated into Scripture [1][2A].
Early Creeds
These creeds long predate the Apostles and Nicene Creeds. Some date as early as 18 months after Christ’s death, if not before [2B][3][4]. Creeds, it should be noted, are identified by scholars through grammar, linguistic cues, and writing style among other things.
What is considered among the earliest is the statement that Jesus is Lord (Matt. 28: 18; Acts 2: 36 and 10: 36; Rom. 10: 9-13; 1 Cor. 12: 3; Phil. 2: 11; Rev. 17: 14). The title “Lord” used here is the personal name for God in the Old Testament.
Another early creed can be found at 1 Cor. 15: 3-5:
“For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures, and that He was seen by Cephas, then by the twelve.”
This supports the substitutionary death of Christ, i.e. His death for our sins (a fundamental tenet of Christianity denied by Progressives) and His bodily Resurrection (another tenet many Progressives deny) both with trustworthy lines of Scriptural and real life evidence.
Yet a third early creed can be found at Rom. 1: 3-4:
“concerning His Son Jesus Christ our Lord, who was born of the seed of David according to the flesh, and declared to be the Son of God with power according to the Spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead.”
Moreover, scholars date the canonical Gospels to between 65 AD and 95 AD, within the time limits of reliable memory [7A]. This is coupled with the fact they contain highly accurate information as to geography, personal names, botanical terms, financial norms, local language and customs – details which mediate against compilation at a later date by strangers to the events described [7B].
Divinity
Christ was more than a messenger, more than a good man, more than a moral example. He was and is the Incarnate Son of God, both fully God and fully man. He rose bodily, physically, literally – not just metaphorically – from the dead. Read more…
Much as we may protest, we are living in a postmodern era [1A][2A]. Across a variety of fields, postmodernism translates into a conviction that previous ways of depicting the world are no longer reliable [1B].
The scholar Hans Bertens describes postmodernism as a deeply felt loss of confidence in mankind’s ability to represent the real at all [1C]. This has resulted in a critical re-examination of established institutions and social norms [1D][2B]. Objectivity is considered an illusion [2C]. Vision supersedes hard data like historic facts [2D].
It is essential that this be understood, if Christians are to reach a lost generation.
Questioning Tradition
Deconstruction, in any context, involves the following [2E]:
- Avoiding absolute statements.
- Denying the legitimacy of dichotomies, such as good and evil.
- Finding the exception to any generalization, and pushing it to the limit.
- Interpreting arguments in their most extreme form.
- Writing obscurely, so as to allow for the most possible interpretations.
Faith deconstruction is a postmodern process of rethinking Christian faith without regarding Scripture as a standard [3].
Tragically, faith deconstruction is a sincere but misguided effort to find the truth without reference to the most reliable source of truth, i.e. Scripture. Progressive Christianity is the form this takes [4A]. Read more…
Model of Second Temple (Temple of Herod), Israel Museum, Author Ariely (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported)
“The great masses of the people… will more easily fall victim to a big lie than to a small one…”
–Adolf Hitler, “Mein Kampf” [1A]
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.”
–Nazi Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels [1B]
The Big Lie is the term for a propaganda technique which involves repetition of a known falsehood as if it were self-evidently true [1C]. The goal behind this technique is to shift an argument so that the Big Lie is taken for granted, rather than questioned critically or ignored entirely.
Nazi Antisemitism
As a general rule, for a Big Lie to be effective it must appeal to the bias of listeners, yet be stated in a bland and matter of fact manner [1D]. The Big Lie Adolf Hitler employed in Nazi propaganda, for instance, was the false claim – rooted in antisemitism – that Jews were responsible for all of Germany’s ills.
Temple Denial
Since the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948 and particularly since the Six-Day War in 1967, the Arab world has increasingly supported the contention that no Jewish temple ever stood on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem [2][3]. The First and Second Temples, if they existed at all, supposedly stood in the city of Nablus on the West Bank, in Yemen, or elsewhere.
The purpose of this particular Big Lie, known as temple denial, is to undermine the legitimate claim by Jews to the Temple Mount, Jerusalem, and the Holy Land, itself.
History and Archaeology
To anyone at all familiar with history or archaeology, this lie is so obvious as to be laughable. Read more…
Credit card terminal with a Visa credit card inserted, Author Basile Morin, (CC BY-SA 4.0 International)
There was a time not long ago when the poor were criticized for taking out credit cards in their children’s names. Desperate people do desperate things. Nonetheless, this was considered identity theft, and viewed as despicable [1].
By contrast, wealthier parents are now urged to add their young children – even toddlers – as authorized users on their credit and debit cards [2][3]. This is being marketed as a way to teach children the value of money, and develop a strong credit score for them early on.
Bank of America, Chase, and TD Bank are among the financial institutions that allow parents to add children as authorized users on parental credit card accounts. Several such banks (including the three named) have no minimum age requirement.
Theoretically, parents who give their children access to credit will closely monitor their children’s spending and, also, teach their children to repay the money borrowed [4][5][6]. However, this is by no means guaranteed.
Approximately 70% of American adults carry some form of debt. That includes credit card debt, mortgages, auto loans, and student loans [7A]. Nearly 48% of credit card holders report carrying a credit card balance from month to month [7B].
A Debtor Class
Though young children do not understand money, they can be trained to spend it. A two year old will happily swipe a credit card while her mother cheers her on. Read more…
ISIS fighter, Somalia, Image courtesy of Washington Institute https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/somalia-new-frontline-islamic-states-global-expansion
WARNING: Graphic Images
Tradition has it that the evangelist Mark first brought Christianity to Alexandria, Egypt in 60 AD [1]. Islam reached Africa in the 7th Century through Arab conquests [2]. European missionary efforts in West Africa began in the late 15th Century [1B][3].
The history of Islamic-Christian relations in Africa is complex and nuanced, with periods both of conflict and peaceful co-existence [4A]. But there is widespread Islamic persecution of Christians in Africa today [5A]. This can be found in the Central African Republic, Ethiopia, Nigeria, Sudan, Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger, Cameroon, Kenya, Somalia, Mozambique, and elsewhere [5B][6]. Victims may be tortured and mutilated, before they are killed. Millions have been displaced.
Rape as a Weapon
“…[T]he violence interrupts their ability to eat and sleep…They suffer from nightmares and panic attacks. They may be unable to perform basic tasks at work or home. They may struggle to parent their children, who are themselves often victims of the same incidents. They may struggle to attend church or even talk with others. These effects – especially if not cared for appropriately – can last for years.”
–Cole Richards, Pres. of Voice of the Martyrs [7]
Though a number of verses in the Quran call for treating Christians and Jews with respect, many Muslims find it difficult not to see Christians as polytheists because of the doctrine of the Trinity [4B]. Sexual violence is used as a tactic of terror by radical Islamists [5C]. Women and girls are captured, enslaved, and systematically raped. This is religiously justified as treatment of the “infidel”.
Where Is God?
Suffering so severe is shattering. It interrupts core aspects of healthy living. Where then is God in such suffering? Read more…
Gnostic Mass Temple (2011), New Orleans, Author Alombrados (CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported)
We examine this week the attraction of the heresy of Gnosticism for the modern world [1A][2]. Ecclesia Gnostica, for example, has parishes across the United States, including Austin, Portland, and Los Angeles [3].
False Authenticity
Many have accepted as fact the false claim by author Dan Brown in his best-selling novel, The Da Vinci Code, that the Gnostic gospels were supposedly earlier and more accurate than the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, but were suppressed by the Emperor Constantine [4A][5A]. They mistake the current Gnostic revival for reform, based on texts supposedly more valid than the original canon.
Those unfamiliar with Scripture and history may even mistake Gnosticism for fresh revelation.
Sin Excused
“One part of Gnosticism that appeals to people is that it reduces sin to a necessary function of the material body, which is in any case ‘not the real me’. It provides a convenient way to escape the reality and the guilt of sin…” [4B].
Gnostic ideas are expressed in Rosicrucianism and Scientology [5B]. Scientologists, for instance, do not view humanity as fundamentally sinful, or in need of Salvation through atonement and grace.
The psychoanalyst Carl Jung, also, drew on ancient Gnostic teaching in his work [5C]. Jung felt the traditional catalog of sins was simplistic [6]. He did acknowledge a “shadow” within the psyche, but considered this a negative aspect of personality that needed to be integrated.
Elitism
“By assuring its adherents that they are specially enlightened people, Gnosticism panders to human pride. The appeal of being part of an elite must not be underestimated…Gnosticism, with its teaching of salvation by secret knowledge, appealed to the same desires as the ancient mystery cults… The Gnostic could look down his nose at…ordinary Christians…” [4C].
The same is true today.
Escape
“This world, it [Gnosticism] tells its adherents, is a mistake; it ought not to be. I should not be in this world, the Gnostic says, and the real me is a fragment of divinity” [4D].
The Gnostic belief that the physical world is innately evil holds special appeal to those wounded by this fallen world [7]. In reality, the Gnostic heresy offers only superficial relief for despair, alienation, and fear. Christ alone can comfort and heal us.
Sexuality
“Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves, who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator…” (Rom. 1: 24-25).
And Gnostic thought is at the root of the modern debate about sexuality [8][12A].
Gnostics view the male-female distinction as part of the evil creation order, therefore, something to be rejected [12B]. Androgeny is the ideal [12C]. Since the “real you” is presumed to be inside, what is felt overrides all external factors, including biological reality [12D].
Gnostic thought promotes feminine characteristics, such as love and nurture, as positive “spiritual” traits in contrast to masculine “physical” qualities such as aggression and strength [5D]. Mary Magdalene is often an important figure in Gnostic thought [5E].
By contrast, in keeping with Gnostic contempt for the body, the so called Gospel of Thomas states, “For every woman who makes herself male will enter the Kingdom of Heaven [5F].” This holds great appeal for those in the Transgender Movement suffering from gender dysphoria.
We have already discussed the Gnostic underpinning for homosexuality.
Again, one can clearly sees Satan’s hand in this. Satan seeks to undermine the natural order God established, and destroy the image of God in mankind by leading us into sin [13]. But God made us male and female (Gen. 1: 27; Matt. 19: 4-5).
Gnostic texts of Gospel of Thomas and The Secret Book of John a/k/a Apocryphon of John, Codex II The Nag Hammadi manuscripts, Source https://manuscritoseneltiempo.blogspot.com/, (PD)
Gnosticism is a distorted form of Christianity again gaining popularity [1A][2A][3][4A][12A]. This post is not equipped to explore all the nuances of Gnosticism (which is not a single, standardized belief system), but rather highlights the principal areas where Gnosticism deviates from Christianity.
Gnosticism (which asserts that the natural realm was created by an evil lesser god or demiurge, and emphasizes an elite spiritual knowledge over faith as necessary for Salvation) has been considered a heresy by mainstream Christianity from the outset, as historic creeds reflect [5A][6A].
The Catholic, Presbyterian, Lutheran, and Baptist churches still see Gnosticism as heretical [6B][13]. The Methodist and Episcopal churches for centuries did recognize Gnosticism as a heresy but are currently equivocating, in response to cultural pressures [7A][8].
Scripture, itself, warns against Gnostic influence at 1 Tim. 6: 20, 1 Cor. 8: 1-3, 1 John 4: 1-3 and elsewhere.
Background
A blend of Christian and pagan beliefs, Gnosticism arose in the 2nd Century, incorporating elements of Judaism and Greek philosophy with religions from Syria, Asia Minor, Persia, and India. The name Gnostic comes from the Greek gnosis, meaning “knowledge”.
Like most heresies, Gnosticism was founded on a twisted version of the truth, a partial truth taken as the whole [4B].
“The Gnostics believed there was a…secret knowledge reserved for those with true understanding, leading to the salvation of the soul. Spiritual salvation was of preeminence to the Gnostics because they thought the human spirit was naturally good and was entrapped or imprisoned in the body, which was naturally evil or merely an illusion. Their goal, therefore, was to free the spirit from its embodied prison…” [1B].
Gnostics, for example, considered sex and marriage evil, since procreation merely produces more “evil” bodies [5B]. As a result, by warped logic, some sects considered contraception, adultery, fornication, and homosexuality good [5C].
Because of this spirit-matter dualism, Gnostics generally rejected the Old Testament, viewing it as false [4C]. Cain and the inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorrah were the real heroes, from the Gnostic perspective. This was all the more ironic, since Gnostics have always prided themselves on seeking knowledge, and the Bible – Old and New Testaments – is the revealed word of God, Himself.
Early church fathers like Ignatius of Antioch (c. 35 – 108 AD), Justin Martyr (c. 100 AD – 166 AD), Irenaeus (c. 130 AD – c. 200 AD), and Tertullian (c. 160 AD – 225 AD) condemned Gnostic beliefs as inconsistent with Christian doctrine [9A][12B].
Doctrine, in the sense used here, is not meant to suggest a rigid set of rules, but rather the best and most accurate reading of Scripture, as guided by the Holy Spirit (John 14: 26, 15: 25, 16: 8, and 16: 13). Many Gnostic texts, for instance, do not deal with sin and repentance. Rather, they focus on illusion and enlightenment, offering the allure of secret knowledge.
The Manichees, a Gnostic sect founded by the Persian teacher Mani, continued into the 13th Century [6C]. The Albigenses and Cathars (12th and 13th Centuries), also, followed Gnostic thought [6D].
A renewed interest in Gnosticism developed after the discovery in 1945 of Egypt’s Nag Hammadi library, a collection of 50 rare Gnostic texts, including the so called Gospel of Thomas, Gospel of Philip, Secret Book of John a/k/a Apocryphon of John, Apocryphal Epistle of James, Apocalypse of Paul, Letter of Peter to Philip, Gospel of Truth, Gospel of the Egyptians, On the Resurrection, Dialogue of the Redeemer, and Apocalypse of Adam [10][11].
The so called Gospel of Judas was found separately. This portrays Judas Iscariot, who betrayed Christ, instead as the most enlightened disciple, who received secret instructions from Christ [9B].
Most scholars today agree that the Gnostic texts are later than the canonical sources. Read more…
“The Crossing of the Red Sea” by Nicolas Poussin (1634), National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne, Australia (Accession No. 1843-4), Source/Photographer http://www.1st-art-gallery.com/Nicolas-Poussin/The-Crossing-Of-The-Red-Sea,-C.1634.html (PD)
This week we conclude our examination of the archaeological evidence for Moses.
Yam Suf
“Then Moses stretched out his hand over the sea; and the Lord caused the sea to go back by a strong east wind all that night, and made the sea into dry land, and the waters were divided. So the children of Israel went into the midst of the sea on the dry ground, and the waters were a wall to them on their right hand and on their left” (Ex. 14: 21-22).
Yam Suf (also spelled Yam Suph) refers to the body of water the Israelites crossed during the Exodus [1].
But Yam Suf (generally translated as the “Sea of Reeds”) is used in the Bible to refer to two different locations: the Gulf of Aqaba a/k/a the Red Sea and the Gulf of Suez [2]. Some scholars, also, suggest it may refer to the El-Ballah lake region between the Gulf of Suez and the Mediterranean forming a defensive barrier on the eastern frontier of Egypt [3].
Controversy, therefore, remains as to where the Exodus crossing actually took place.
The existence of a sandbar perpendicular to shore or a raised plateau on the sea floor which the wind could have temporarily revealed has been put forward as one explanation for how the miracle may have taken place [4]. Wind setdown is a natural phenomenon in which strong, persistent winds blowing offshore cause a temporary drop in water levels, exposing submerged areas [5].
Again, however, the timing would have had to be precise to allow the Israelites to pass, yet drown the Egyptian troops following them.
Mount Sinai
The Bible does not give the exact location of Mount Sinai which most biblical scholars agree was another name for Mount Horeb. There are several candidates.
Of these, Jabal Musa (translated from the Arabic as the “Mountain of Moses”) on the Sinai Peninsula is a leading contender based on oral tradition [6]. Located at its base is the Greek Orthodox Monastery of St. Catherine founded in 527 AD [7].
There is evidence of encampment in what is thought to be the area of Rephidim in Saudi Arabia where the Israelites camped on their way to Mount Sinai, as the Bible says [8][9][10]. Rephidim is where Moses first struck the rock and water gushed forth. Read more…









